285.In economic crimes, if the victim commit suicide, the main mastermind should be executed.
3 April 2016
China recently is in the financial reform period, and there are much economic crime and fraud rampant.
Previously, such economic crimes were executed as illegal fund-raising frauds, which some later thought were inhumane and needed to Integration with the west. So economic crimes did not sentence to death.
Of course, this is justified, because the definition of economic crime is relatively vague. It is difficult to strictly distinguish the difference between investment failure and pure fraud. The recent death penalty of several economic crimes is more controversial.
Normally, if the money was raised to the actual investment behavior, it is investment failure, and if with no investment behavior, it is purely a fraud.
Of course, there are some loopholes, such as a small part of the money is invested in some unreliable projects, but a lot of money is transferred. It is difficult to define by using whether there is an investment.
Fraudulent acts can be criminalized in two ways.
1. The authenticity of investment behavior. It requires professional professionals to evaluate that the truth of the investment and whether the investment was worth so much money at the time, or a false project to concoct various pretexts and transfer assets. If the vast majority of money used to invest in physical projects, the criminal can be considered to be investment failure, and avoid death.
If the investment project isn’t exist at all. or it is assessed as a pure investment bogus project by industry insiders to transfer a lot of property. It can be characterized as malicious fraud and the criminal can be executed.
If the criminal invests in fake projects or projects that are worthless at all, in order to defraud money, we should sentence the standards for the consequences of it.
If the victim due to a large number of money loss, mental breakdown, and suicide killed by jumping, poisoning, hanging, drowned, and other. The mastermind is the murder of the crime, and should be executed.
If the victim is emotionally stable, no one has committed suicide, the criminal can avoid death.
On the one hand, the punishment conviction is based on subjective investment behavior. on the other hand, sentencing is based on the consequences which is more appropriate.
On the one hand, we should protect the legitimate investment behavior, on the other hand, we should punish the acts of malicious fraud.
You can't let the bad guys go by in order to protecting the good guys.
You can't hurt a good man in order to fight bad people
Business is complicated and I see a lot of that.
There are many bosses who work hard every day, but fail to invest. They are heroes, and they should be protected.
There are a lot of people, who is a pure swindler, has no bottom line and has no humanity. This kind of man should be executed.
The two types of people are almost identical in appearance, and it is hard to distinguish them from outsiders
But if we condemn at will, it will cause injustice. And we will destroy the economic development of the society and become the accomplices of demon.
We can collect money to invest, but we should explain the use of the money and it can be confirmed. If it is not clear, it will be a fraud and the criminal can be executed.